Analyzing the Parable of the Sadhu

Egoism: Does the execute arouse the persons long term interest. present the question is what action promotes McCoys & the hikers interest. The main purpose of every(prenominal)(prenominal) the hikers was to travel to Nepal and pay a once in a life term experience. It is conceivable that this is consistent with every unrivalleds best interests, while dowery the Sadhu is clearly non. go through was ethical. However the fact that McCoy feels conscience-smitten reflects that he was unable to promote his long term interest. whencece it becomes ambiguous to justify his actions. Kantian Ethics: Should abide by the hobby 2 rules: *axiom should become a universal law * neer accomplish the great unwashed simply as means to an contain except always at the same time as ends in themselves In the parable, Stephen says that the hikers would have treated the Sadhu differently if he had been from the same ethnic group as them. However Kantian principle forbids such behaviour. O ne should treat all equally irrespective of ethnicity, caste, sex etc. Further, if they were treating the Sadhu as a becoming tender being, they should have understood that saving a human race life is far more valuable than accomplishing a goal. Under this principle the action was unethical.

However one of the shortcomings to Kantian ethics is that it does not give priority for duties. If as a hiker my best duty is to complete my hike then in that gaffe the duty of saving a human life whitethorn fall below it. In this berth the moral compositors case of a person will declaim which duty one must follow. Veil of Ignorance: The key i s that people make decisions based on what i! s good for their community as a whole, and without regard to their make self-interest (since they operate shag a veil of ignorance and dont... If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, collection it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay